LOADING

Type to search

State Appeals Court Orders New Hearing for Washington Man who Says He was Wrongly Convicted

Law & Order

State Appeals Court Orders New Hearing for Washington Man who Says He was Wrongly Convicted

A state court of Appeals in Washington has ordered a new hearing to evaluate a man’s claims that he was wrongly convicted in the shooting of a Washington state trooper who later became a sheriff.

Martin Jones, the accused is serving a 50-year sentence after being convicted of shooting Scott Johnson in 2010 in Long Beach, Pacific County. After the shooting, Johnson was elected sheriff, and he served two terms before losing a re-election bid last fall.

Two years ago Jones’ attorney, Lenell Nussbaum, requested a new trial. He had shown new evidence that included a sworn declaration from Peter Boer, a local drug dealer, that on the night of the shooting, his brother Nicholas, a repeat felon, confessed to it and asked him to dispose of gun parts. After the release of the sketch, several people called the police to say that the composite description of the suspect that aired on television news closely resembled Nick Boer.

The lone witness of the shooting is the tow-truck driver. He told police Jones wasn’t the culprit, but Johnson said he was.

However, on Thursday, a three-judge state Court of Appeals panel said a superior court judge should evaluate whether the new evidence is admissible in court, and if so, whether Jones’ conviction should be overturned. One of the judges, Thomas Bjorgen, said the information presented in the appeal “tend to create a reasonable doubt as to Jones’s guilt.”

“The new evidence before us is of a highly compelling nature: among other matters an admission to the crime by another individual, multiple identifications of that individual from a composite sketch made from a description by a witness at the scene, and evidence that the same individual made serious threats against another if he was not given an alibi for the night of the shooting,” Bjorgen wrote.

Nussbaum called the ruling “a huge deal for Marty.”

“Our end goal has always been a new trial,” she said Friday. “What we’ve accomplished is a huge step in that direction.”

However, in an interview with The Associated Press in 2017, Nick Boer denied having shot the trooper, calling his brother “exotic in his imagination,” and Johnson also rejected it.

As per the records, Johnson was helping the tow-truck driver impound a minivan around 1 a.m. on Feb. 13, 2010, when he was shot. The van was then driven by Jones’ wife, Susan, who had just been arrested for drunken driving. The .22-caliber bullet broke apart and remains lodged near the base of Johnson’s skull.

According to the phone records, Jones had been at his house shortly before the shooting. He was arrested the next morning.

As per the state’s theory, Jones, a grandfather with no criminal history and with close relatives in law enforcement, got out of bed after receiving a text from his wife that she’d been pulled over. He walked 1.3 miles, or possibly drove part of that distance, to her van. He saw and spoke with the tow-truck driver, whom he knew, and who could presumably identify him. He became enraged and shot the trooper with a handgun. The tow-truck driver couldn’t recognize Jones because he didn’t get a good enough look.

Investigators found a box of .22-caliber ammunition in Jones’ house. An expert also testified that microscopic markings on the shell found at the scene forensically matched the shells in the box — suggesting the bullet that shot the trooper came from the box in Jones’ house.

William Tobin, a retired manager of forensic metallurgy at the FBI Laboratory in Washington, D.C., reviewed the case as a part of Jones’ appeal. He wrote that the type of analysis has been discredited and has no scientific foundation.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *